- Top page
- Requests for having additional charts at this website
- Remarks on the forthcoming books
- Preliminary remarks
- Design and Examples
- Glossary
- English Experiments
- EPSA [31]-1 (=[31]-8)
- EPSA [31]-2 (=[31]-9)
- EPSA [31]-3 (=[31]-10)
- EPSA [31]-4 (=[31]-11)
- EPSA [31]-5 (=[31]-12)
- EPSA [31]-7 (=[31]-13)
- Japanese Experiments
- a- vs. so-
- EPSA [10]-5
- EPSA [10]-10
- EPSA [10]-11
- soko and soitu
- EPSA [3]-7
- LF c-command condition on FD
- EPSA [33]-2
- EPSA [33]-3
- EPSA [33]-8
- EPSA [33]-9
- EPSA [33]-17
- EPSA [33]-18
- EPSA [1]-18
- EPSA [1]-20
- EPSA [1]-21
- EPSA [1]-33
- EPSA [1]-34
- otagai
- EPSA [5]-1
- EPSA [5]-3
- EPSA [5]-5
- local disjointness
- EPSA [35]-4
Hajime Hoji .Language Faculty Science |
 © Cambridge University Press |
EPSA [31]-3 (=[31]-10)
This is discussed in Chapter 6. It is a Sub-Experiment for the Main-Experiments EPSA [31]-4 (= [31]-11) and EPSA [31]-5 (= [31]-12). More specifically, it is intended to identify which informants among those who participated in EPSA [31]-4 (= [31]-11) and EPSA [31]-5 (= [31]-12) can accept sentences in which a pronoun precedes its "antecedent." If they cannot, their No Answer on the *Examples in the Main-Experiments cannot be considered significant with regard to the validity of the Main Hypotheses in the Main-Experiments.
Design
Examples
Results
The following results show the absence of effects of informant classification in the case of Binding Condition C/D, in sharp contrast to what is observed in the case of [31]-4 (=[31]-11).
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)).
[31]-10 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-7.
[31]-10 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-11, only considering Schema group 2.
[31]-10 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-11 and [31]-4, only considering Schema group 2 of [31]-11 and [31]-4.
[31]-10 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list