- Top page
- Requests for having additional charts at this website
- Remarks on the forthcoming books
- Preliminary remarks
- Design and Examples
- Glossary
- English Experiments
- EPSA [31]-1 (=[31]-8)
- EPSA [31]-2 (=[31]-9)
- EPSA [31]-3 (=[31]-10)
- EPSA [31]-4 (=[31]-11)
- EPSA [31]-5 (=[31]-12)
- EPSA [31]-7 (=[31]-13)
- Japanese Experiments
- a- vs. so-
- EPSA [10]-5
- EPSA [10]-10
- EPSA [10]-11
- soko and soitu
- EPSA [3]-7
- LF c-command condition on FD
- EPSA [33]-2
- EPSA [33]-3
- EPSA [33]-8
- EPSA [33]-9
- EPSA [33]-17
- EPSA [33]-18
- EPSA [1]-18
- EPSA [1]-20
- EPSA [1]-21
- EPSA [1]-33
- EPSA [1]-34
- otagai
- EPSA [5]-1
- EPSA [5]-3
- EPSA [5]-5
- local disjointness
- EPSA [35]-4
Hajime Hoji .Language Faculty Science |
 © Cambridge University Press |
EPSA [10]-5
This is a Sub-Experiment for EPSA [1]-n and EPSA [33]-n. The specification of the intended dependency interpretation is context-based. The Examples in EPSA [10]-5 (with context-based specifications of the intended dependency interpretation) and EPSA [10]-10 (with prose-based specifications of the intended dependency interpretation) are identical. The two LGs in these EPSA Experiments are BVA(mittu-no kyuudan, soko/asoko) 'BVA(three ball clubs, it)' and BVA(subete-no kyuudan, soko/asoko) 'BVA(every ball club, it)'.
Design
Examples
Results
Effects of informant classification on a *Schema-based prediction
Informant list for [10]-5:
based on: [3]-7, soitu; &
based on [3]-7, soko
The informant classification is based on the result of [3]-7, considering both Lexical group 3 (soitu-tati vs. soitu) and Lexical group 4 (sono 2-sya vs. soko). We consider only those informants whose %(Y) on B is 0% and whose %(Y) on A is 50% or higher in [3]-7, both with Lexical group 3 and with Lexical group 4.
[10]-5 Summary, based on the above informant list
[10]-5 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list