9989 answers

EPSA [31] : BVA in English
Experiment #7 [Straight List of Raw Data]

The answers are listed as they have been reported.
The blue boxes are for okExamples; the light pink boxes are for *Examples.
The value in the box under β represents the reported judgment; when it is not 0 for a *Example, the box is marked yellow.

codename example β time test type
L1334295770nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.13 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.13 (11:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
X1334106255oC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.13 (11:41) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (11:44) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (11:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (12:25) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (12:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (14:55) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:01) Five-ranking (one each)
N1334263124iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (17:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:46) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (23:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.13 (23:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.13 (23:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.13 (23:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.13 (23:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334374479eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (11:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (12:17) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334451161rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:12) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (18:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:25) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:26) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:56) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (19:58) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (20:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.14 (22:34) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.14 (23:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.14 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.15 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334512739nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (11:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (11:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (11:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (13:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (14:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (14:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (14:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (15:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (15:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (15:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (15:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (15:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (15:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (15:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334529685rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334529685rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (16:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:00) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (16:53) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (16:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.15 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.15 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (16:59) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (18:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (18:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (18:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.15 (18:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:22) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (18:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (18:50) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334541300cC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545276aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:10) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:19) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.15 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.15 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334545783gC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334545783gC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334545783gC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:26) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.15 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334549763e 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (21:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (21:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (21:52) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.15 (22:18) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:30) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:30) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:30) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.15 (22:32) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334101407oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.15 (23:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (00:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (00:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334380292iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:15) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (00:28) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334380292iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334380292iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (00:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (00:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (00:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (00:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (00:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334561848zE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (00:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (02:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334566462eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (08:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334263924lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334263924lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:51) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (08:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (09:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334591025kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334591025kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (09:02) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (10:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334166330nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
R1334166330nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (10:04) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334594637dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
L1334594637dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (12:08) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334612741mE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334612741mE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (14:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334612812rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (14:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (15:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334613677gC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (15:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (15:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334614357kEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (15:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
Q1334615918kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:13) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334108643aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334108643aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334108643aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334108643aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334108643aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334617141sEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334617141sEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:17) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334108643aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334108643aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334618513sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (16:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (17:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.16 (17:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1334109581rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
G1334109581rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:23) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (17:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2012.04.16 (17:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
O1334618878eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
O1334618878eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (17:46) Five-ranking (one each)
W1334625256nC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1334625256nC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (18:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (18:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (18:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334561455hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334191259rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334344567gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
M1334344567gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:45) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334191259rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (19:46) Five-ranking (one each)
D1334632357dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (20:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.16 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1334632357dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334266680rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334638902aEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334638902aEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334638902aEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334266680rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334266680rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (22:11) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334637676bE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334637676bE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334282822iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
A1334282822iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:12) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334624879oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
V1334624879oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:20) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (22:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334592208eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (23:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334578368nK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334578368nK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
T1334592208eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:29) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334635817uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2012.04.16 (23:56) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334635817uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2012.04.16 (23:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334639743s 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334639743s 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.16 (23:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.17 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.17 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1334635817uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334635817uE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.17 (00:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.17 (00:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.17 (00:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.17 (00:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.17 (00:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334183309bE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
S1334183309bE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.17 (00:05) Five-ranking (one each)
M1351212264iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.25 (18:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.25 (18:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1351212264iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.25 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1351210725kK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
C1351210725kK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.25 (18:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1351483434aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.28 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.28 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.28 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.10.28 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.10.28 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.10.28 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.28 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.28 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.28 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.10.28 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.10.28 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.10.28 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.28 (21:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.28 (21:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.28 (21:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.10.28 (21:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.10.28 (21:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1351483434aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.10.28 (21:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.02 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.02 (16:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.07 (12:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.07 (12:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.07 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.07 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.07 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.07 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.11.07 (12:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.07 (12:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.07 (12:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.07 (12:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.07 (12:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.07 (12:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.07 (12:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.07 (12:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1352320100r 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.07 (12:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1352366117oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1352366117oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (02:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
b1352393867 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.11.08 (09:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
b1352393867 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
b1352393867 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.11.08 (09:37) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.22 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
G1358920836dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.22 (22:33) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (00:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.23 (00:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (00:35) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358957871iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (08:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.23 (08:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.01.23 (08:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358957871iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.01.23 (08:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:37) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:40) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (15:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (17:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (17:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (17:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (17:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (17:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (17:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (17:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (17:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (17:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (17:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (21:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (21:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (22:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (22:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (22:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.01.23 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.23 (22:20) Five-ranking (one each)
B1359060448tE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1359060448tE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (13:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1359056848yE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
E1359056848yE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (15:28) Five-ranking (one each)
K1358908372sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (16:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (16:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (16:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (16:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.24 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.24 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (17:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
V1359077867pE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.24 (18:13) Five-ranking (one each)
G1359150812lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.25 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.25 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1358988752iC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.01.25 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.25 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.25 (16:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.25 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.25 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.25 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.25 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.25 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.25 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1358988752iC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.25 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.27 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (13:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (13:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:43) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (19:47) Five-ranking (one each)
C1358915929tE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.27 (22:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359411360kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.01.28 (14:46) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (20:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359010635nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.28 (20:11) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.29 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359064762sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.29 (13:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.30 (23:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.01.30 (23:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.30 (23:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.01.30 (23:51) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
R1359599518hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.30 (23:53) Five-ranking (one each)
C1359652170lC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (09:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.01.31 (09:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (09:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (09:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (09:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (09:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (09:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (09:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (09:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (09:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (09:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (09:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (09:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (09:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (09:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (09:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (09:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (09:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (16:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (16:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
I1359657675m 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.01.31 (21:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359657675m 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.01.31 (21:16) Five-ranking (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (10:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1359739847rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (10:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359755456eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (14:08) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359323860lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.01 (21:10) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (22:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (22:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (22:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.01 (22:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
I1359322158yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.01 (22:04) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (02:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (02:56) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359357689vE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:57) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (02:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (11:58) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359320451hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (12:03) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.02 (15:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.02 (15:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (15:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (15:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.02 (15:32) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.02 (15:37) Five-ranking (one each)
N1359702779eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.03 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.03 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.03 (23:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.03 (23:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.03 (23:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.03 (23:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.03 (23:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.03 (23:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.03 (23:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (09:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (09:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (09:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (09:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (09:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (09:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (09:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (09:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (09:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (09:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (09:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (09:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (09:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (09:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.04 (10:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (10:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (10:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (10:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (10:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (10:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (10:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.04 (12:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.02.04 (12:43) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.04 (12:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (12:41) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360008478sK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.04 (14:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (14:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (19:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360031874iC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (19:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (20:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360033896eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360033896eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (20:15) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (21:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.04 (21:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (21:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:26) Five-ranking (one each)
K1360043018wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358984476nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358984476nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (21:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
T1360045180iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.04 (22:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.04 (22:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.04 (23:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (23:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (23:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (23:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360049472eEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.04 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (23:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.04 (23:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.04 (23:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.04 (23:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.04 (23:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.04 (23:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (09:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (09:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (09:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (09:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (09:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (09:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (09:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (09:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (09:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (09:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (09:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (09:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
a1360086190vE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
a1360086190vE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
a1360086190vE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
a1360086190vE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
a1360086190vE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
a1360086190vE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1360087165nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360087238u 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360087238u 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (10:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:20) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:39) Yes-or-No (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:44) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
E1360087634oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360087634oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:45) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (10:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1360089254gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
N1360089254gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (10:59) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:29) Five-ranking (one each)
K1360091513gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (11:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (11:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
F1358990612iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:06) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360095539nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360095539nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (12:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
G1360090592rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (12:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (12:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (12:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (12:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360097914uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (13:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360097914uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360097914uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (13:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:20) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
C13600536017E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
C13600536017E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (13:21) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:35) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (13:38) Five-ranking (one each)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (13:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (14:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (14:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (14:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (14:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (14:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (14:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360015270lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (14:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1360099782eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
B1360099782eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1359057250uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359057250uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1360100978nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
S1360100978nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:14) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
W1360089026nEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
W1360089026nEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
W1360089026nEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
W1360089026nEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:36) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (18:41) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360115739eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (18:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (18:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360115739eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360115739eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:43) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:46) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360116860iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:13) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360038131sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360038131sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (19:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360119773cE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (19:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:36) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
P1360108088l 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.02.05 (20:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
P1360108088l 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
P1360108088l 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:46) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359101569sK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (20:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1359652170lC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (21:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360129664wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:12) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:27) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:30) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (22:30) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:30) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:31) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360132013iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360132013iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (22:57) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (23:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (23:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (23:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.02.05 (23:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (23:07) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (23:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.02.05 (23:14) Five-ranking (one each)
H1360009661iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.02.05 (23:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.09.21 (14:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.09.21 (14:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.09.21 (14:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.09.21 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.09.21 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.09.21 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.09.21 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.09.21 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.09.21 (14:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1351898456oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.09.21 (14:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.21 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.21 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.01.21 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.21 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.21 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.21 (20:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Es1390363585E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.21 (20:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.22 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.22 (16:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.22 (16:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.22 (16:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Il1390435556E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Il1390435556E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.22 (16:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (12:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (12:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (12:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
En1390509007E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
En1390509007E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (12:34) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390519806E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390519806E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rc1390520620E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rc1390520620E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Hk1390503727E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (16:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Mx1390525848C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (17:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (17:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (17:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (17:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (17:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (17:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (17:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (17:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (17:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (17:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (17:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (17:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (17:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (17:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (17:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (17:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (17:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (17:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mx1390525848C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (17:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Mx1390525848C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (17:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (18:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (18:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (18:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (18:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ay1390530566E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (18:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (20:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.23 (20:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gl1390595315 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Gl1390595315 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.24 (12:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ym1390615534E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.24 (18:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.24 (18:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.24 (18:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ym1390615534E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.24 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.01.25 (13:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wo1390684926E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wo1390684926E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (13:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ay1390530566E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (15:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Rh1390694502E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.25 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.25 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.25 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.25 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.25 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Rh1390694502E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.25 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.25 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.01.25 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.25 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.01.25 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.25 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.01.25 (18:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.01.25 (18:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (11:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1390763632K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1390763632K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (11:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Aw1390773730E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Aw1390773730E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (14:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (17:20) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ae1390789669E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (18:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (18:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (18:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (18:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (18:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (18:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (18:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (18:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (18:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.26 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.26 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ae1390789669E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (21:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (21:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (21:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ve1390798786E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ve1390798786E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sa1390805972E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (23:03) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
At1390808480E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
At1390808480E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.26 (23:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.27 (16:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.27 (16:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.01.27 (16:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.27 (16:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.27 (16:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.27 (16:56) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.27 (16:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ez1390870411E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390870411E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.27 (17:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Mh1390879240 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.27 (19:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.27 (19:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.27 (19:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Mh1390879240 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.27 (19:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.28 (00:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.28 (00:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.28 (00:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.28 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.28 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.28 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.28 (09:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.28 (09:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.28 (09:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.28 (09:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.28 (09:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.28 (09:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.28 (09:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.28 (09:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.28 (09:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.28 (09:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ci1390503757E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.28 (10:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ar1390600933E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ar1390600933E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.29 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (11:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (11:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ea1391110374E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ea1391110374E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (11:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (12:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (12:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (12:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (12:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (12:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ka1391115322E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (13:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (22:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (22:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (22:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (22:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ax1390455942K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ax1390455942K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.01.30 (22:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Wn1391197915E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.31 (11:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (11:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.01.31 (11:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.01.31 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.31 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Wn1391197915E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (11:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (12:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Io1391200346K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Io1391200346K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (12:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.01.31 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Eu1391211041E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Eu1391211041E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.01.31 (15:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (14:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (14:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (14:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (14:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (14:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (14:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (16:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (16:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (16:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tg1391300338E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tg1391300338E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.01 (16:26) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.01 (21:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (21:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1391317484E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1391317484E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.01 (21:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.02 (10:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.02 (10:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.02 (10:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Vt1390539957E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Vt1390539957E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.02 (10:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390503967E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.02 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.02 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.02 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.02 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.02 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.02 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390503967E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (01:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (17:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (17:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (17:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (17:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ey1391476215K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ey1391476215K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (17:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ai1391479815E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.03 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.03 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (18:15) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (18:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (18:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (18:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.03 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.03 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.03 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.03 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.03 (18:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.03 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.03 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.03 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.03 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.03 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ai1391479815E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.03 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.04 (16:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.05 (15:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (15:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (15:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.05 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (16:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1390505881C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1390505881C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (16:01) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Je1391658857E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (20:06) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (23:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sv1391672055E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sv1391672055E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.05 (23:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1391732250E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.06 (16:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.06 (16:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.06 (16:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.06 (16:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.06 (16:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.06 (16:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Me1391732250E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.06 (16:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.06 (17:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.06 (17:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dy1391737984C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.06 (17:55) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ah1391888539E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.08 (11:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ez1390719167E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.08 (22:22) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392082739E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.10 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.10 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.10 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.10 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.10 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.10 (17:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392082739E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.10 (17:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.10 (22:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.11 (02:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.11 (02:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.11 (02:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.11 (02:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.11 (02:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.11 (02:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.11 (02:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.11 (02:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.11 (02:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ah1392113919 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.11 (02:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Bo1392318566EJ 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jj1392319425EK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jj1392319425EK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (11:31) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sn1392318492C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (12:08) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (13:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (13:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
La1390781458E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
La1390781458E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (13:10) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1392338229E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jo1392338229E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.13 (16:41) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jd1390501582E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.15 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.15 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.15 (16:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jd1390501582E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.15 (16:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ki1392552650K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ki1392552650K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (04:12) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (14:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ot1390503946E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ot1390503946E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (14:24) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ya1391542926C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.16 (15:19) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Kh1390807912E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Kh1390807912E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (13:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:00) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (14:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (14:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (14:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (14:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Al1391395259E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Al1391395259E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (14:04) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tn1391392075EC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tn1391392075EC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.17 (16:28) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.18 (15:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ln1391061369E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ln1391061369E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.18 (15:38) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.02.18 (19:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Yg1392781023C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Yg1392781023C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.18 (19:42) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (12:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (12:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (12:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (12:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (12:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jn1392842653E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
Jn1392842653E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (12:50) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (17:47) Yes-or-No (one each)
To1392860690K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
To1392860690K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (17:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (18:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.19 (18:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (18:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (18:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (18:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (18:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (18:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (18:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (18:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (18:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (18:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (18:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (18:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (18:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (18:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jl1392862247E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (18:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (19:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (19:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (19:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (19:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (19:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (19:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Gb1392865281E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (19:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (22:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (22:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (22:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (22:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (22:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Js1392878749E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Js1392878749E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.19 (22:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Ft1390506851EK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:16) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.19 (23:54) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sl1392318599 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.20 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (00:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.20 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.20 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.20 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.20 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (00:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (00:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (00:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (00:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sl1392318599 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (00:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.20 (14:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (14:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.20 (14:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.20 (14:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (14:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.20 (14:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (14:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (14:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (14:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (14:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.20 (14:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392936235E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (14:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.20 (14:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.20 (14:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (14:57) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.20 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.20 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.20 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.20 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (15:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (15:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.20 (15:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (15:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (15:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.20 (15:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hi1392937012E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (15:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sh1392955837E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sh1392955837E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.20 (20:11) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (13:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (13:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
xt1393018652C 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
xt1393018652C 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.21 (13:44) Yes-or-No (one each)
Su1393022321K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Su1393022321K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (14:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.21 (16:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.21 (16:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.21 (16:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (16:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (16:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (16:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sa1390701677 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (16:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (20:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (20:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (20:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (20:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (20:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (20:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Ao1393042584E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (20:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Cu1393046814K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (23:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (23:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dn1393051224EK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Dn1393051224EK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.21 (23:46) Yes-or-No (one each)
Zu1393058182 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (00:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (00:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.02.22 (00:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Zu1393058182 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (00:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:19) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (08:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (08:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (08:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Pi1391084617E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Pi1391084617E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (08:21) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (10:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (10:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (10:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (10:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (10:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (10:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (10:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (10:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (10:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.22 (10:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (10:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2014.02.22 (10:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (11:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (11:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (11:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (11:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (11:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (11:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:03) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (11:05) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Me1393119886K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (17:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Tr1391673096K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (18:49) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (19:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Sg1390362538K 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Sg1390362538K 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (19:17) Yes-or-No (one each)
Na1390537500E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2014.02.22 (23:53) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Na1390537500E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2014.02.22 (23:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)