| Schema Group #1 |
WCO in Schema B; the regular SVO in Schema A. |
| Schema A1 |
ok NP V [... B ... ] ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) |
| Schema B1 |
* [ ... B ... ] V NP ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) |
| Schema C1 |
ok [ ... B ... ] V NP ( With B being referential ) |
| Schema Group #2 |
Reconstruction effects in Schema A; Schema B continues to be WCO. |
| Schema A2 |
ok [ ... B ... ] NP V ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) |
| Schema B2 |
* [ ... B ... ] V NP ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) |
| Schema C2 |
ok [ ... B ... ] V NP ( With B being referential ) |
| Schema Group #3 |
Schema B involves local disjointness
effects, but that is not the main point of this EPSA. The
unacceptability of examples of this schema can be taken as indicating
that the LF c-command is NOT a sufficient structural condition for
BVA(A, B). |
| Schema A3 |
ok NP V [... B ... ] ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) |
| Schema B3 |
* NP V B ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) |
| Schema C3 |
ok NP V B ( With B being referential ) |