Experiment No.4 　

schema design	Schema Group #1 WCO in Schema B Schema A1 ok NP V [... B ... ] 　 ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) Schema B1 * [ ... B ... ] V NP 　 ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) Schema C1 ok [ ... B ... ] V NP 　 ( With B being referential ) Schema Group #2 Reconstruction effects in Schema A, with Schema B continuing to be about WCO Schema A2 ok [ ... B ... ] NP V 　 ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) Schema B2 * [ ... B ... ] V NP 　 ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) Schema C2 ok [ ... B ... ] V NP 　 ( With B being referential ) Schema Group #3 Schema B involves local disjointness effects, but that is not the main point of this EPSA. Schema A3 ok NP V [... B ... ] 　 ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) Schema B3 * NP V B 　 ( Under BVA(NP, B) ) Schema C3 ok NP V B 　 ( With B being referential )
example design	Lexical Group #1 every boy Lexical Group #2 no boy
test design	accept until 2014/02/22 Yes-or-No (in sets) Included Times shown = 1 The number of Example tokens = 18 Yes-or-No (one each) Included Times shown = 1 The number of Example tokens = 18 Five-ranking (in sets) Excluded Times shown = 1 The number of Example tokens = 18 Five-ranking (one each) Excluded Times shown = 1 The number of Example tokens = 18