[The font formatting is lost here; and I am not concerned with that.]
Without g(a, b), we do not have two okExamples corresponding to the *Example. Unlike the case with g(a, b) considered above, we cannot therefore, in principle, have a reasonable ground for excluding the complete unacceptability of a *Example to "parsing" difficulty or the unnaturalness of the interpretation of the entire a.
excluding ==> attributing
(I think I was going with "excluding the possibility of xxx" at one point and was not able to completely fix the sentences here...) |